|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEAR AND LOATHING OF MADELEINE ALBRIGHT
Meet Madeleine
Albright, former US Secretary of State, a fine upstanding ideological lunatic and mass
murderer, worthy of our humble respect.
We will have to excuse poor misguided author William Blum for his slight deviancy
from accepted figures of Iraqi casualties.
US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright has not only
conceded that sanctions are not affecting the Iraqi regime, she's also stated that
sanctions are amongst the most powerful weapon in the US arsenal. The logic and cruelty
defies belief. The US bends backwards to proclaim their support for human rights world
wide, yet applies sanctions to a civilian population who have no control over their
leaders, and whom the sanctions do not, by the US' own admission, effect.
The practical result is that sanctions systematically kill Iraqi children at a rate of up
to 6000 a month and the US Secretary of State says that this is a price worth paying for
the punishment of Saddam Hussein.
The number of Iraqi civilians who have died from the direct and indirect results of
sanctions is just under 2 million. This is death on the same scale as Pol Pot's 'Killing
Fields' of Cambodia, and thus one of the five worst genocides of the 20th century. To put
it bluntly, in the words of Professor Noam Chomsky: 'This is not foreign policy, this is
state sanctioned mass murder that is approaching holocaust proportions.'
Madeleine Albright, ethically challenged:
1)
Asked if it is not hypocritical to punish Burma for human rights violations while
refraining from sanctions on China for similar actions, Albright replied:
"We have consistent principles and flexible
tactics." [1]
The same "flexible tactics" (English translation: hypocrisy) are evident in the
policies embraced by Albright toward Cuba, Libya, Iraq, et al, as opposed to the policies
toward Turkey, Indonesia, Mexico, Peru, and Colombia.
2)
Television interview, "60 Minutes", May 12, 1996:
Lesley Stahl, speaking of US sanctions against Iraq:
"We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that's more
children than died in Hiroshima. And - and you know, is the price worth it_"
Madeleine Albright: "I think this is a very hard choice,
but the price -- we think the price is worth it." [2]
At the Town Hall in Columbus, Ohio, Feb. 18, 1998, Ms. Albright was moved to declare:
"I am willing to make a bet to anyone here that we care
more about the Iraqi people than Saddam Hussein does."
Though her logic may escape us, she may yet have some DNA molecules for compassion.
On May 21 she signed an agreement between the U.S. and six Latin American countries to
protect dolphins, declaring:
"This is one of the strongest agreements ever negotiated
to conserve marine life."
3)
Albright in Guatemala, talking to a group of impoverished children:
"Why would [I] and the United States care about what is
happening here_ The reason is we are all one family and when one part of our family is not
happy or suffers, we all suffer." [3]
Thus speaketh the leading foreign policy officer of the country directly responsible for
bringing more than 40 years of poverty, torture, death squads, massacres and disappeared
people to Guatemala, without even a hint of apology or restitution, ever.
4)
To a student who asked Albright whether the United States was not spending too much
of its resources on being the world's policeman and too little on more pressing domestic
concerns, Albright asked him in return to estimate what share of the federal budget goes
to foreign policy. When he guessed 15 or 20 percent, Albright pounced:
"It's 1 percent, 1 percent of the entire budget."
[4]
Her reply was conspicuously disingenuous. At best, she was referring to the budget
of only the State Department, concealing what everyone knows, even the teenage student she
browbeat - US foreign policy expenditures must include the Defense Department, the CIA,
the National Security Agency, and a host of other government agencies. Together they
consume more than 50 percent of the budget.
5)
In February 1996, as UN ambassador, Albright reacted with righteous indignation
against the Cuban pilots who expressed satisfaction after shooting down two planes of
Cubans from Florida which were headed toward Cuba. 'This one won't mess around any more,'
one of the pilots is reported to have exclaimed.
"I was struck by the joy
of these pilots in committing cold-blooded murder," Albright said, also
accusing the Cuban pilots of "cowardice". [5]
What, one may ask, does she think of the American pilots who, while bombing and strafing
helpless retreating Iraqis in 1991, exclaimed: "we toasted
him" ... "we hit the jackpot" ... "a turkey shoot" ... "shooting
fish in a barrel" ... "basically just sitting
ducks" ... "There's just nothing like it. It's the
biggest Fourth of July show you've ever seen, and to see those tanks just `boom', and more
stuff just keeps spewing out of them ... they just become white hot. It's wonderful."
[6]
6)
On October 8, 1997, in announcing the designation of 18 additional foreign
political organizations as terrorist-supporting groups, Secretary of State Albright
declared that she wanted to help make the United States a:
"No support for terrorism zone."
It could be suggested that if the Secretary were
truly committed to this goal, instead of offering her usual lip service, she should begin
at home - the anti-Castro community in Miami, collectively, is one of the longest-lasting
and most prolific terrorist organizations in the world. Over the years they've carried out
hundreds of bombings, shootings, and murders, blown up an airplane, killing 73 people,
fired a bazooka at the United Nations, and much, much more. But Madame Albright will not
lift a finger against them. The State Department designates Cuba as one of the states
which harbors terrorists. The United States can well be added to that list.
7)
At the fabricated 'Town Hall' meeting (in which the officials came not to listen,
but to tell) held in Columbus, Ohio, February 18, 1998, concerning Iraq, Albright was
heckled and asked critical, and perhaps uncomfortable, questions. At one point, her mind
and her integrity could come up with no better response than to make something up:
"I am really surprised that people feel that it is necessary to defend the rights of Saddam Hussein."
At another point, a besieged Albright was moved to yell:
"We are the greatest country in the world!"
Patriotism is indeed the last refuge of a scoundrel,
though her words didn't quite have the ring of "Deutschland über alles" or
"Rule Britannia". Finally, unable to provide answers that satisfied or quieted
the questioners, she stated that she would meet with them after the meeting to answer
their questions. But as soon as the meeting ended, the Secretary of State was out of
their, posthaste. Her offer, it would seem, had just been a tactic to try and pacify the
hostile crowd.
8)
And here is Madame Albright at her jingoist best, on TV the day after the Town Hall
meeting, again in the context of Iraq:
"If we have to use force, it is because we are America! We are
the indispensable nation. We stand tall, and we see further into the future." [7]
9)
Madeleine Albright, then UN Ambassador, informed the UN Security Council during a
1994 discussion about Iraq:
"We recognize this area as vital to US national interests and we will behave, with others, multilaterally when we can and unilaterally when we must." [8]
Ms. Albright is thus stating that the United States
recognizes no external constraints on its behavior, when it decides that a particular area
of the world is "vital to US national interests". It would of course be
difficult to locate a spot on the globe that Albright and the United States do not regard
as "vital to US national interests.
10)
On more than one occasion while U.N. ambassador, Albright yelled at U.N.
Secretary-General Boutros-Ghali that he must not publish the report about Israel's bombing
of the U.N.-run refugee camp in Qana, Lebanon, in April 1996, which killed more than 100
refugees. The U.N. report said that the attack was not a mistake, as Israel claimed.
Albright -- who has surrounded herself with alumni of Israeli and Jewish lobbies -- warned
the Secretary-General that if the report came out, the U.S. would veto him for his second
term. The report came out, and so did Boutros Boutros-Ghali. [9]
11)
Madeleine the humanitarian:
"Not a good idea...." to link human rights and trade issues. [10]
A philosophy that could have been used to justify
trade with Nazi Germany ... or anyone else ... or anything.
12)
To Colin Powell, formerly of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who felt that the U.S.
should not commit military forces to Bosnia until there was a clear political objective:
"What's the point of having this superb military that you're always talking about if we can't use it_"
"I thought I would have an aneurysm," Powell later
wrote. "American GIs were not toy soldiers to be moved around
on some sort of global game board." [11]
My note: Oh really_
Notes
[1] Washington Post, April 23, 1997, p.4
[2] "60 Minutes", May 12, 1996
[3] Washington Post, May 5, 1997, p.20
[4] Washington Post, May 14, 1997
[5] Washington Post Feb. 28, 1996
[6] Los Angeles Times and Washington Post, both Feb. 27, 1991, page 1
[7] NBC "Today" show, February 19, 1998
[8] Middle East International (London), Oct. 21, 1994, p. 4
[9] New York Times, Jan. 1, 1997
[10] Washington Post, March 1, 1999, p. 13
[11] Colin Powell with Joseph Persico, My American Journey (NY, 1995), p. 576
Written by William Blum, author of 'Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions
Since World War Two.'
